Towards the end of "A Room of One's Own," I began to notice that the author praises men and their ability to convey their writing in such a "direct" and "straightforward" fashion (99). Not only does she allude to the male writing figure once. She also goes on to make several other complimentary comments. Had she attributed women with more credit, this wouldn't have really stuck out to me; however the author seems to downplay women. After hours of reading literature written by female authors, she makes the comment,"indeed, it was delightful to read a man's writing again" (99). Seemingly, Virginia Woolf would seem more excited about women branching into new fields and capturing new opportunities, since she argues that women need a place of their own to write successfully.
It would be wrong to say that the author gives women no credit because she does, a few pages prior to making the statement on page 99. The narrator praises Mary Carmichael for writing not only "as a woman," but also "as a woman who has forgotten that she is a woman, so that her pages were full of curious sexuality" achievable "only when sex is unconscious itself" (93). After critiquing Carmichael's unfamiliar syntax and lack of flow, she finally commends the writer for her ability to develop her own voice, in a sense, and write in a completely unconscious frame of mind. However, I am bothered because the narrator makes this discover, but a few pages later, she begins attributing all of these desirable writing qualities to men, as if women's literature was so bleak and unskillfully written all along. I don't understand how you can say something one minute, then suddenly resort back to your previous state of mind.
Somehow, I had this idea that Woolf was pro-women's rights initially, especially with women recently gaining the right to vote less than a decade ago; however, I am disappointed that she (or the narrator) tends to continuously emphasize the great power of males and how anything in their makings will always be valued more highly. I was hoping that the narrative characters would be more willing to step out of their mindset of submissive women in the 20's and desire more equality with men, more so. Perhaps thoughts like these would have been to far-fetched back in 1928...
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Brittani, I agree with you that I was hoping that the 1920's submissive mindset would be broken here, but every time I found myself hoping for that, I had to remind myself that the stronger woman does not really come to be an important role in history until later 1950's when rebellion and civil rights spark...
I agree, it is disheartening to hear her talk about men with such high standards. But i think we have to take into consideration the time period. Women weren't socialized to write and they weren't praised for it. Virginia Woolf also talks about how women had to write in secret, so maybe she included the good ways men write to make her story acceptable. Perhaps she really wanted her work published and she might have thought this would help take the edge off all she said about women being banned from writing.
Post a Comment